Why? because Microsoft is incompatible with the rest of the known universe.

When moving from Windows to *ANY* platform, the cost is going to be higher.

Basically, it puts the idea that the property *COULD* increase in value completely out of the equation.

If I were to move from one area to another, I could simply argue that I might as well stay in the same house because I would have to pay for stuff to be packaged up, trucked to the new house and then unpacked. For the forum, all one needs is a database, say Posgres, PhP and Phorum.Ģ) People put too much emphasis on “initial cost”. Both of these are provided by mature software already available. Most people I know, who have deployed Sharepoint have simply used one or two of the most basic functions, namely, the discussion forum and instant messaging. Interesting article, however, the first quesiton I wish to ask is this What server application is missing that is available on Windows but not on Linux?ġ) The article talks about a so-called “integrated approach”, could some one explain to me the real benefits of integration between Office and Sharepoint? are there any real world examples out there where real data can be pointed to as proof that such a model improves efficiency?

Filemaker pro 18 server upgrade pricing